Granite Code 8B vs Granite Code 20B: Which AI Model Should You Choose?
Pricing, context windows, latency, capabilities, and a one-line code switch β everything you need to pick the right model.
Choose Granite Code 8B for long documents (128K tokens context). Choose Granite Code 20B for shorter prompts where the smaller window keeps latency and cost down.
Side-by-side specs
| Spec | Granite Code 8B | Granite Code 20B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Replicate | Replicate |
| Category | Code | Code |
| Input cost / 1M tokens | $0.060 | $0.12 |
| Output cost / 1M tokens | $0.30 | $0.60 |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Max output tokens | 8,192 | 8,192 |
| Avg. latency | β | β |
| Featured | β | β |
| New | β | β |
| Capabilities | text | text |
Pricing example
A typical chat workload of 100,000 input tokens plus 50,000 output tokens.
100K in Γ $0.060 + 50K out Γ $0.30
100K in Γ $0.12 + 50K out Γ $0.60
For this workload, Granite Code 8B is cheaper than Granite Code 20B by $0.021 per request.
Switch in one line
Both models live behind Railwail's OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Replace the model string and you are done.
import OpenAI from "openai";
const client = new OpenAI({
apiKey: process.env.RAILWAIL_API_KEY,
baseURL: "https://railwail.com/v1",
});
// Before β using Granite Code 8B
let r = await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "ibm-granite/granite-8b-code-instruct-128k",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});
// After β switched to Granite Code 20B
r = await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "ibm-granite/granite-20b-code-instruct-8k",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});from openai import OpenAI
client = OpenAI(
api_key=os.environ["RAILWAIL_API_KEY"],
base_url="https://railwail.com/v1",
)
# Before β using Granite Code 8B
r = client.chat.completions.create(
model="ibm-granite/granite-8b-code-instruct-128k",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
# After β switched to Granite Code 20B
r = client.chat.completions.create(
model="ibm-granite/granite-20b-code-instruct-8k",
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)# Before β using Granite Code 8B
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "ibm-granite/granite-8b-code-instruct-128k",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
}'
# After β switched to Granite Code 20B
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "ibm-granite/granite-20b-code-instruct-8k",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
}'Which one wins for...
Quick verdicts derived from public specs. Always validate on your own workload.
Higher coding category match or larger context wins.
Bigger context window helps maintain long-form coherence.
The larger context window is the deciding factor.
Multimodal/vision support is required for image inputs.
Lower average latency wins for interactive UX.
The model with the lower input-token price wins.
Frequently asked questions
Try Granite Code 8B and Granite Code 20B side by side
One API key, one endpoint, both models. Start free β no credit card required.