Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Which AI Model Should You Choose?

Pricing, context windows, latency, capabilities, and a one-line code switch — everything you need to pick the right model.

Anthropic
Multimodal
vs
Anthropic
Multimodal
Verdict

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for cost-sensitive workloads — it is roughly 3.0× cheaper on input tokens. Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 when you need its broader capabilities or stronger benchmarks.

Choose Claude Sonnet 4.6 for long documents (1.0M tokens context). Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 for shorter prompts where the smaller window keeps latency and cost down.

Side-by-side specs

SpecClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.6
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
CategoryMultimodalMultimodal
Input cost / 1M tokens$1.20$3.60
Output cost / 1M tokens$6.00$18.00
Context window200K tokens1.0M tokens
Max output tokens64,000128,000
Avg. latency——
Featured—Yes
NewYesYes
Capabilities
text
image
text
image

Pricing example

A typical chat workload of 100,000 input tokens plus 50,000 output tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5
$0.42

100K in × $1.20 + 50K out × $6.00

Claude Sonnet 4.6
$1.26

100K in × $3.60 + 50K out × $18.00

For this workload, Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6 by $0.84 per request.

Switch in one line

Both models live behind Railwail's OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Replace the model string and you are done.

JavaScript / TypeScript
import OpenAI from "openai";

const client = new OpenAI({
  apiKey: process.env.RAILWAIL_API_KEY,
  baseURL: "https://railwail.com/v1",
});

// Before — using Claude Haiku 4.5
let r = await client.chat.completions.create({
  model: "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
  messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});

// After — switched to Claude Sonnet 4.6
r = await client.chat.completions.create({
  model: "claude-sonnet-4-6",
  messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});
Python
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key=os.environ["RAILWAIL_API_KEY"],
    base_url="https://railwail.com/v1",
)

# Before — using Claude Haiku 4.5
r = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)

# After — switched to Claude Sonnet 4.6
r = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="claude-sonnet-4-6",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
cURL
# Before — using Claude Haiku 4.5
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
  }'

# After — switched to Claude Sonnet 4.6
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "claude-sonnet-4-6",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
  }'

Which one wins for...

Quick verdicts derived from public specs. Always validate on your own workload.

Coding
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Higher coding category match or larger context wins.

Writing
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Bigger context window helps maintain long-form coherence.

Long documents
Claude Sonnet 4.6

The larger context window is the deciding factor.

Vision
Tie

Multimodal/vision support is required for image inputs.

Real-time chat
Tie

Lower average latency wins for interactive UX.

Cost-sensitive
Claude Haiku 4.5

The model with the lower input-token price wins.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is cheaper. On a 100K input + 50K output example, Claude Haiku 4.5 costs about $0.42 versus $1.26 for Claude Sonnet 4.6 — a saving of $0.84.
Which has more context, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the larger context window at 1.0M tokens, compared to 200K tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 better than Claude Sonnet 4.6 for coding?
For coding-heavy workloads we lean toward Claude Sonnet 4.6 on this comparison — it scores higher on the relevant heuristics (category, tags, or context window). Both models are usable for code via Railwail's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so the safest path is to A/B test on your own prompts.
Can I use both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 via Railwail?
Yes. Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 are accessible through a single Railwail API key and the OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions endpoint. You only change the "model" parameter to switch between them — no SDK swap, no separate billing.
How do I switch from Claude Haiku 4.5 to Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Replace the model identifier "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001" with "claude-sonnet-4-6" in your request payload. Everything else — API key, base URL, request shape — stays the same. See the code example on this page for the exact one-line change.

Try Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 side by side

One API key, one endpoint, both models. Start free — no credit card required.