WizardCoder 33B
wizardcoder-33bWizardLM WizardCoder 33B v1.1. Evol-Instruct fine-tune of DeepSeek-Coder-33B with strong code-generation benchmark performance.
- Price
- โ US$0.0253/run
- Context
- 16,384 tokens
- Max. output
- 4,096 tokens
- Input โ output
- Text โ Text
- Developer
- Community
- Updated
- September 23, 2026
Playground
Try WizardCoder 33B
Input & output
This run
about US$0.0253 ยท 2.53 credits
US$0.0757 (7.57 credits) are reserved at the start; the actual GPU time is billed.
For accounts without a purchase: runs above 2 credits need a top-up.
New here?
10 free credits (US$0.10) when you sign up with Google
Usable 24 hours after sign-up, up to 5 runs per day and at most 2 credits per run. Other sign-in methods start without credits.
Examples
Prompt
Write a snake game in Python
Response
Writing a complete snake game with graphics and sound effects would be quite long, but here's a simple version of it using the pygame library: ```python import pygame from random import randint # Initialize Pygame pygame.init() # Define some colors BLACK = (0, 0, 0) WHITE = (255, 255, 255) RED = (255, 0, 0) GREEN = (0, 255, 0) # Set the width and height of each snake segment segment_width = 15 segment_height = 15 # Margin between each cell margin = 3 # Create a 2 dimensional array. A two dimensional # array is simply a list of lists. grid = [] for row in range(10): # Add an empty array that will hold each cell # in this row grid.append([]) for column in range(10): grid[row].append(0) # Append a cell # Set initial position of snake x_pos = 5 y_pos = 5 grid[x_pos][y_pos] = 's' snake_segments = [[x_pos, y_pos]] # Generate random apple position apple_position = [randint(0, 9), randint(0, 9)] while grid[apple_position[0]][apple_position[1]] != 0: apple_position = [randint(0, 9), randint(0, 9)] grid[apple_position[0]][apple_position[1]] = 'a' # Set title of screen pygame.display.set_caption("Snake Game") clock = pygame.time.Clock() done = False direction = "right" score = 0 while not done: for event in pygame.event.get(): # User did something if event.type == pygame.QUIT: # If user clicked close done = True # Flag that we are done so we exit this loop elif event.type == pygame.KEYDOWN: if event.โฆ
Settings
system_prompt: Below is an instruction that describes a task. Write a response that appropriately completes the request.
About WizardCoder 33B
WizardCoder 33B is a model by Community in the Code category. On Railwail, WizardCoder 33B costs โ US$0.0253 per run. The context window holds 16,384 tokens, and one response can be up to 4,096 tokens long.
Pricing
| Typical run (โ 22 s on L40S) | US$0.0253 per run |
|---|---|
| GPU time (L40S) | US$0.00117 per GPU second |
- Billed by the GPU time the run actually takes. When the run starts, 3ร the typical price is reserved from your balance and settled afterwards.
- 1 credit = US$0.01
Cost calculator
Price calculator
Typical according to the provider: about 21.5 s
Total
US$2.53
253 credits
Per run
US$0.0253 ยท 2.53 credits
Billed by the actual GPU time; this is an estimate.
API
No verified API example
The public API passes a different input format than this model needs. Use the playground above.
Specifications
- Model ID
wizardcoder-33b- Developer
- Community
- Category
- Code
- Input
- Text
- Output
- Text
- Context window
- 16,384 tokens
- Max. output
- 4,096 tokens
- Billing
- By usage (tokens or GPU time)
- Catalog entry updated
- September 23, 2026
Tags
- replicate
- code-generation
- wizardlm
- open-weights
Use cases
Frequently asked questions
What is WizardCoder 33B?
WizardCoder 33B is a model by Community in the Code category.
How much does WizardCoder 33B cost on Railwail?
On Railwail, WizardCoder 33B costs โ US$0.0253 per run. You are charged for what each request actually uses. Usage is paid from prepaid credits; 1 credit equals US$0.01.
What is the context window of WizardCoder 33B?
The context window of WizardCoder 33B holds 16,384 tokens. One response can be up to 4,096 tokens long.
How fast is WizardCoder 33B?
There are not enough measured runs of WizardCoder 33B on Railwail yet to state a run time. It depends on the input, the settings and the load at the provider.
Is WizardCoder 33B better than Code Llama 13B Instruct?
That depends on the task. WizardCoder 33B (Community) and Code Llama 13B Instruct (Meta) are both models in the Code category. The comparison page shows their prices and specifications side by side.
Compare WizardCoder 33B and Code Llama 13B InstructComparable models
All in this categoryMeta's 13B Code Llama tuned for instruction following. A faster mid-size option for code generation and completion, supporting infilling for inserting code at a cursor position. Served on Replicate per call.
Meta's 34B Code Llama tuned for instruction following. A balance of size and quality for code generation, completion, and explanation, with strong coverage of Python, JavaScript, and other common languages. Runs on Replicate per call.
Meta's largest Code Llama, a 70B Llama-2 derivative specialized for programming and tuned to follow instructions in chat form. Handles code generation, completion, and explanation across common languages. Served on Replicate as a per-call endpoint.
All models through one API
One API key for every model on Railwail. Usage is charged from prepaid credits, 1 credit = US$0.01.