Railwail
Accedi

MiniCPM-V 2.6 vs Depth Anything v2: Which AI Model Should You Choose?

Pricing, context windows, latency, capabilities, and a one-line code switch — everything you need to pick the right model.

Replicate
Multimodal
vs
Replicate
Multimodal
Verdict

MiniCPM-V 2.6 and Depth Anything v2 are closely matched on pricing and context. The right choice depends on your specific workload — see the table below for the full breakdown.

Side-by-side specs

SpecMiniCPM-V 2.6Depth Anything v2
ProviderReplicateReplicate
CategoryMultimodalMultimodal
Input cost / 1M tokensn/an/a
Output cost / 1M tokensn/an/a
Context window33K tokens—
Max output tokens4,096—
Avg. latency——
Featured—Yes
New——
Capabilities
text
image
video
image

Pricing example

A typical chat workload of 100,000 input tokens plus 50,000 output tokens.

MiniCPM-V 2.6
n/a

100K in × n/a + 50K out × n/a

Depth Anything v2
n/a

100K in × n/a + 50K out × n/a

Switch in one line

Both models live behind Railwail's OpenAI-compatible endpoint. Replace the model string and you are done.

JavaScript / TypeScript
import OpenAI from "openai";

const client = new OpenAI({
  apiKey: process.env.RAILWAIL_API_KEY,
  baseURL: "https://railwail.com/v1",
});

// Before — using MiniCPM-V 2.6
let r = await client.chat.completions.create({
  model: "hexiaochun/minicpm_v26",
  messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});

// After — switched to Depth Anything v2
r = await client.chat.completions.create({
  model: "chenxwh/depth-anything-v2",
  messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello" }],
});
Python
from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI(
    api_key=os.environ["RAILWAIL_API_KEY"],
    base_url="https://railwail.com/v1",
)

# Before — using MiniCPM-V 2.6
r = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="hexiaochun/minicpm_v26",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)

# After — switched to Depth Anything v2
r = client.chat.completions.create(
    model="chenxwh/depth-anything-v2",
    messages=[{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}],
)
cURL
# Before — using MiniCPM-V 2.6
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "hexiaochun/minicpm_v26",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
  }'

# After — switched to Depth Anything v2
curl https://railwail.com/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $RAILWAIL_API_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "chenxwh/depth-anything-v2",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello"}]
  }'

Which one wins for...

Quick verdicts derived from public specs. Always validate on your own workload.

Coding
MiniCPM-V 2.6

Higher coding category match or larger context wins.

Writing
MiniCPM-V 2.6

Bigger context window helps maintain long-form coherence.

Long documents
MiniCPM-V 2.6

The larger context window is the deciding factor.

Vision
Tie

Multimodal/vision support is required for image inputs.

Real-time chat
Tie

Lower average latency wins for interactive UX.

Cost-sensitive
Tie

The model with the lower input-token price wins.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, MiniCPM-V 2.6 or Depth Anything v2?
MiniCPM-V 2.6 and Depth Anything v2 cannot be compared on per-token price: at least one of them has no per-token price listed (it is priced per run or not yet priced). See each model page for its current price.
Which has more context, MiniCPM-V 2.6 or Depth Anything v2?
MiniCPM-V 2.6 has the larger context window at 33K tokens, compared to — for Depth Anything v2.
Is MiniCPM-V 2.6 better than Depth Anything v2 for coding?
For coding-heavy workloads we lean toward MiniCPM-V 2.6 on this comparison — it scores higher on the relevant heuristics (category, tags, or context window). Both models are usable for code via Railwail's OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so the safest path is to A/B test on your own prompts.
Can I use both MiniCPM-V 2.6 and Depth Anything v2 via Railwail?
Yes. Both MiniCPM-V 2.6 and Depth Anything v2 are accessible through a single Railwail API key and the OpenAI-compatible /v1/chat/completions endpoint. You only change the "model" parameter to switch between them — no SDK swap, no separate billing.
How do I switch from MiniCPM-V 2.6 to Depth Anything v2?
Replace the model identifier "hexiaochun/minicpm_v26" with "chenxwh/depth-anything-v2" in your request payload. Everything else — API key, base URL, request shape — stays the same. See the code example on this page for the exact one-line change.

Try MiniCPM-V 2.6 and Depth Anything v2 side by side

One API key, one endpoint, both models. Start free — no credit card required.

Get Started FreeView MiniCPM-V 2.6View Depth Anything v2