EasyOCR

MultimodalAvailable
by CommunityModel ID: easyocr

JaidedAI EasyOCR. Simple Python OCR wrapper supporting 80+ languages with deep-learning text detection and recognition.

Price
β‰ˆ $0.0014/run
Input β†’ output
Text + Image β†’ Text
Developer
Community
Updated
September 23, 2026
01

Playground

Try EasyOCR

No input form

β‰ˆ $0.0014/run

No input form for this model yet

Its inputs are not documented yet. So that no run fails on a wrong input, we don't offer a form here. Pick a comparable model instead.

02

Examples

Real outputs from the public examples of this model on Replicate, with the prompt and settings that produced them. They were not generated live on this page.
  • InputInput

    No text prompt: the model only takes the input shown.

    Response

    The Life and Work of Fredson Bowers by G. THOMAS TANSELLE N EVERY FIELD OF ENDEAVOR THERE ARE A FEW FIGURES WHOSE AGCOM- plishment and influence cause them to be the symbols of their age; their careers and oeuvres become the touchstones by which the field is measured and its history told. In the related pursuits of analytical and descriptive bibliography, textual criticism, and scholarly editing, Fredson Bowers was such a figure, dominating the four decades after 1949, when his Principles of Bibliographical Description was pub- lished. By 1973 the period was already being called β€œthe age of Bowers”: in that year Norman Sanders, writing the chapter on textual scholarship for Stanley Wells's Shakespeare: Select Bibliographies, gave this title to a section of his essay. For most people, it would be achievement enough to rise to such a position in a field as complex as Shakespearean textual studies; but Bowers played an equally important role in other areas. Editors of nineteenth-century American authors, for example, would also have to call the recent past β€œthe age of Bowers,” as would the writers of descriptive bibliographies of authors and presses. His ubiquity in the broad field of bibliographical and textual study, his seemingly com- plete possession of it, distinguished him from his illustrious predeces- sors and made him the personification of bibliographical scholarship in his time. When in 1969 Bowers was awarded the Gold Medal of the Biblio- graphical Society in Lo…

  • InputInput

    No text prompt: the model only takes the input shown.

    Response

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness...

03

About EasyOCR

TL;DRAs of September 23, 2026

EasyOCR is a model by Community in the Multimodal category. On Railwail, EasyOCR costs β‰ˆ $0.0014 per run.

04

Pricing

Prices in US dollars. Usage is charged from prepaid credits.
Typical run (β‰ˆ 11 s on CPU)$0.0014 per run
GPU time (CPU)$0.00012 per GPU second
  • Billed by the GPU time the run actually takes. When the run starts, 3Γ— the typical price is reserved from your balance and settled afterwards.
  • 1 credit = $0.01

Cost calculator

Price calculator

s

Typical according to the provider: about 11 s

Total

$0.14

14 credits

Per run

$0.0014 Β· 0.14 credits

Billed by the actual GPU time; this is an estimate.

05

API

Call EasyOCR with your Railwail API key. Use this model ID in the request:

No verified API example

The public API passes a different input format than this model needs. Use the playground above.

06

Specifications

Model ID
easyocr
Developer
Community
Category
Multimodal
Input
Text, Image
Output
Text
Billing
By usage (tokens or GPU time)
Catalog entry updated
September 23, 2026

Tags

  • replicate
  • ocr
  • vision-understanding
  • multilingual
  • open-source
07

Frequently asked questions

What is EasyOCR?

EasyOCR is a model by Community in the Multimodal category.

How much does EasyOCR cost on Railwail?

On Railwail, EasyOCR costs β‰ˆ $0.0014 per run. You are charged for what each request actually uses. Usage is paid from prepaid credits; 1 credit equals $0.01.

How fast is EasyOCR?

There are not enough measured runs of EasyOCR on Railwail yet to state a run time. It depends on the input, the settings and the load at the provider.

Is EasyOCR better than BLIP?

That depends on the task. EasyOCR (Community) and BLIP (Salesforce) are both models in the Multimodal category. The comparison page shows their prices and specifications side by side.

Compare EasyOCR and BLIP

Can EasyOCR process images?

Yes. EasyOCR accepts images as input in addition to text.

08

Comparable models

All in this category
  • BLIPSalesforce

    Salesforce BLIP. Vision-language model for image captioning and visual question answering. Given an image it writes a short natural-language caption, or answers a question about the image when one is supplied. A widely used baseline for automatic captioning.

    β‰ˆ $0.00030/run

    79 % cheaper per unit

    Compare EasyOCR vs. BLIP
  • pharmapsychotic's CLIP Interrogator. Takes an image and produces a Stable-Diffusion-style text prompt by combining BLIP captioning with CLIP to rank likely subjects, artists, mediums and styles. Commonly used to reverse-engineer a prompt from an existing picture.

    β‰ˆ $0.0457/run

    3,164 % more expensive per unit

    Compare EasyOCR vs. CLIP Interrogator
  • Monocular depth-estimation model trained on 595k labeled and 62M unlabeled images. Strong zero-shot generalization in indoor and outdoor scenes.

    β‰ˆ $0.0050/run

    257 % more expensive per unit

    Compare EasyOCR vs. Depth Anything v2

All models through one API

One API key for every model on Railwail. Usage is charged from prepaid credits, 1 credit = $0.01.