Best AI video generation models, ranked by quality
Models that generate a video clip from a text prompt, compared on Arena quality, the price of one default clip and quality per dollar.
Best AI video generation models, ranked by quality
Sorted by Arena score, highest first. Models without an Arena rating follow, by price.
Median Arena score here: 1 191
| # | Model | Arena score | Price | Value | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Google Veo 3.1 Google DeepMindImage-to-Video Arena: 1 390 | Arena1 362±10 · 25 076 votes | 0,48 $/с1,92 $ for 4 s | 89 pts/$+171 over median | Try |
| 02 | Google Veo 3.1 Fast Google DeepMindImage-to-Video Arena: 1 372 | Arena1 358±10 · 25 870 votes | 0,18 $/с0,72 $ for 4 s | 232 pts/$+167 over median | Try |
| 03 | Arena1 342±6 · 165 462 votes | 0,060 $/с0,30 $ for 5 s | 504 pts/$+151 over median | Try | |
| 04 | Arena1 240±11 · 32 434 votes | 0,084 $/с0,42 $ for 5 s | 116 pts/$+49 over median | Try | |
| 05 | Runway Gen 4.5 Runway | Arena1 225±9 · 48 127 votes | 0,144 $/с0,72 $ for 5 s | 47 pts/$+34 over median | Try |
| 06 | Arena1 206±6 · 89 138 votes | 0,336 $/видео | 45 pts/$+15 over median | Try | |
| 07 | Arena1 191±11 · 12 164 votes | 0,18 $/с0,90 $ for 5 s | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 08 | Arena1 181±12 · 9 379 votes | 0,324 $/видео | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 09 | Arena1 164±16 · 6 531 votes | 0,60 $/с4,80 $ for 8 s | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 10 | Arena1 163±10 · 14 104 votes | 0,336 $/с1,68 $ for 5 s | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 11 | Arena1 113±10 · 16 253 votes | 0,0432 $/с0,216 $ for 5 s | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 12 | Arena1 065±17 · 5 250 votes | 0,216 $/с1,08 $ for 5 s | Not clearly above the median | Try | |
| 13 | Mochi 1 Genmo | Arena1 007±17 · 5 893 votes | ≈ 0,5041 $/запуск | Not clearly above the median | Try |
| Without an Arena rating (14), by price | |||||
| – | LTX-Video (Lightricks) Lightricks | No Arena rating | ≈ 0,0229 $/запуск | Try | |
| – | Wan 2.2 5B Fast Alibaba (Wan) | No Arena rating | 0,030 $/видео | Try | |
| – | Wan 2.2 Text-to-Video Alibaba (Wan) | No Arena rating | 0,060 $/видео | Try | |
| – | No Arena rating | 0,060 $/с0,30 $ for 5 s | Try | ||
| – | Luma Ray Flash 2 Luma AI | No Arena rating | 0,072 $/с0,36 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | Seedance 1 Pro Fast ByteDance | No Arena rating | 0,072 $/с0,36 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | Kling V2.5 Turbo Pro Kuaishou (Kling) | No Arena rating | 0,084 $/с0,42 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | No Arena rating | 0,60 $/видео | Try | ||
| – | Wan 3 Alibaba (Qwen) | No Arena rating | 0,12 $/с0,60 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | No Arena rating | 0,18 $/с0,72 $ for 4 s | Try | ||
| – | Kling v3 Kuaishou (Kling)Image-to-Video Arena: 1 354 | No Arena rating | 0,2688 $/с1,344 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | Kling v3 Omni Kuaishou (Kling) | No Arena rating | 0,2688 $/с1,344 $ for 5 s | Try | |
| – | HunyuanVideo Tencent | No Arena rating | ≈ 3,06 $/запуск | Try | |
| – | No Arena rating | 0,48 $/с3,84 $ for 8 s | Try | ||
Value = Arena points above the median of the rated models in this list per US dollar of one default run; only models whose 95 % interval lies fully above the median get a value rank.
How to read this ranking
- Arena score
- A rating from blind pairwise votes on the public Arena: people compare two anonymous models on the same prompt and pick the better result. Higher is better; ± is the 95 % interval, “votes” the number of battles.
- Price
- What one run with the model’s default settings costs on Railwail, from the same pricing rules that bill your runs (1 credit = $0.01). ≈ marks GPU-time prices: a typical run, billed by the real run time.
- Value
- Value = Arena points above the median of the rated models in this list per US dollar of one default run; only models whose 95 % interval lies fully above the median get a value rank.
- Who is listed
- Lab models you can run on Railwail that create a result from a text prompt alone, plus every model rated on this arena. Tools such as upscalers and community uploads are on the full leaderboard.
- No Arena rating
- The arena has no entry for exactly this model in the setting we run (for example, only a high-reasoning or a 1080p run is rated). We never estimate a score.
- Rank
- The position within this list, not the rank on the arena.
Source
Quality scores: Text-to-Video Arena leaderboard, published 22 сент. 2026 г., retrieved 24 сент. 2026 г. from the LMArena leaderboard dataset. Used under CC BY 4.0; we show the overall score of the models we can match to a Railwail model and rank them within this list.
Questions about this ranking
Which AI video generation model has the highest Arena score on Railwail?
Google Veo 3.1 by Google DeepMind with an Arena score of 1 362 (Text-to-Video Arena, published 22 сент. 2026 г.). Next: Google Veo 3.1 Fast (1 358) and Grok Imagine Video (1 342).
Which AI video generation model is the cheapest on Railwail?
LTX-Video (Lightricks) by Lightricks at ≈ 0,0229 $/запуск. Prices come from the same pricing rules that bill your runs.
Which AI video generation model gives the most quality per dollar?
Grok Imagine Video: 151 Arena points above the median of this list (1 191) at 0,060 $/с, that is 504 points per dollar.
How is value (quality per dollar) calculated?
Value = Arena points above the median of the rated models in this list per US dollar of one default run; only models whose 95 % interval lies fully above the median get a value rank.
Why do some models have no Arena rating?
The public Arena rates many models only in one setting, for example with high reasoning effort, with web search or at 1080p. We show a score only when the rated entry is exactly the model and default setting that runs on Railwail; otherwise the model is listed without a score.